Iran’s nuclear doctrine not likely to change, says its Foreign Minister
Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqhchi said the country's stance against the development of nuclear weapons will not significantly change.
PHOTO: REUTERS
DUBAI – Iran’s stance against the development of nuclear weapons will not significantly change, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Al Jazeera in remarks relayed by Iranian media on March 18, cautioning that the new supreme leader is yet to express his view on the matter publicly.
Former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed early in the US-Israeli war against Iran, opposed the development of weapons of mass destruction in a fatwa, or religious edict, issued in the early 2000s.
Western countries, including the US and Israel, have for years accused Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons, while Iran says its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes.
Mr Araqchi said fatwas depend on the Islamic jurist issuing them and added he was not yet in a position to judge the jurisprudential or political views of Mr Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran’s new supreme leader.
He added that after the war comes to an end, countries that border the Gulf should draft a new protocol for the Strait of Hormuz to ensure that safe passage through the narrow waterway is carried out under certain conditions aligned with Iranian and regional interests.
Iran has shut the vital energy gateway, through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied gas passes, saying it “won’t even allow a litre of oil” to reach the US, Israel and their partners.
On March 17, Iran’s Parliament Speaker tweeted that the situation in the strait would not return to its pre-war conditions.
The US has sought to build a naval coalition to escort vessels navigating the strait, with most NATO allies saying they do not want to get involved in military operations against Iran.
NATO member France said it would only consider a joint international coalition to secure passage through the strait following a ceasefire and prior negotiations with Tehran.
Mr Araqchi said an end to the war was only conceivable if the conflict was permanently over throughout the region and Iran received compensation for the damage incurred.
Asked about Iranian strikes in the Gulf not only targeting US military bases but also impacting residential or commercial areas, Iran’s Foreign Minister said this was because US forces had relocated to urban areas.
“Wherever there were American forces gathering, wherever there were facilities belonging to them, they were targeted. It is possible some of these places were near urban areas,” the top Iranian diplomat said.
Mr Araqchi acknowledged that regional countries are “upset and their people have been harmed or bothered” by Iranian strikes, but added that the blame lay entirely with the US for starting the war on Feb 28. REUTERS


